This page is a wiki. Please login or create an account to begin editing.
Home › Utilities



DiskTracker 2.x

Game screenshot
Rating:
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Category:
Year released:
Author:
Publisher:
#1
[www].se [ftp].se [mirror].us
DiskTracker-v202.sit (1.23 MB)
MD5: e20583d9c15d5924f2d8038943fdf0f0
For System 7.0 - 7.6 - Mac OS 9
#2
[www].se [ftp].se [mirror].us
Disktracker_2.2.2.sit (1.86 MB)
MD5: d8a076626e3a170e4a99132597a9316b
For System 7.0 - 7.6 - Mac OS 9
#3
[www].se [ftp].se [mirror].us
dt_2.3.2_Classic.sit (1.32 MB)
MD5: 12abb86d4b5f4adfe94e39754e9876fa
For System 7.0 - 7.6 - Mac OS 9
Purchase
This software is still available for purchase
Emulation
This app works with: SheepShaver, Basilisk II,

DiskTracker is the complete disk cataloging and labeling system

See Also: DiskTracker 1.x, Disk Wizard 2.0, FileList+, List Files 1.0, VirtualDisk

Compatibility
Architecture: 68k PPC

Comments

MikeTomTom's picture
by MikeTomTom - 2018, January 23 - 11:54pm

but it extracts OK for me on Mac OS 9.2.2

Thanks mrdav. I had DL'd from the US mirror only and assumed it would be the same for both. - The DL on the internal server is OK. The one on the US mirror must have corrupted moving from here to there, as it appears to be unusable.
Tested (US mirror copy) also with the Unarchiver here, it returns "dt_2.3.2_Classic.sit: Couldn't recognize the archive format."

mrdav's picture
by mrdav - 2018, January 23 - 11:26pm

I don't know what version of StuffIt was used, but it extracts OK for me on Mac OS 9.2.2 using StuffIt Expander from StuffIt Deluxe 5.5

MikeTomTom's picture
by MikeTomTom - 2018, January 23 - 10:04pm

The "dt_2.3.2_Classic.sit" upload. Was a version of StuffIt too new for a classic OS used, or not set to slowest compaction method? I'm unable to extract this archive on 9.x.

mrdav's picture
by mrdav - 2017, March 29 - 7:54am

I uploaded (and then removed) an item called Disktracker 2.2.2 that I found on a collection CD. However, the publisher is different so I suspect a different product, so I removed it. Didn't test it though.

EDIT: I have tested it now and it is indeed the same product (and publisher is actually the same), so I have restored it